Jan Minar vs Hugo Armando Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W W L L
Form
W L L L L L W L W LH2H: Minar 1 - 0 Armando
They have played 1 sets in total, with Minar winning 1 and Armando winning 0. The last match between Minar and Armando was at the Prosperita Open 2008 - Ostrava, 05-05-2008, First, Clay with Jan Minar getting the victory 5-3 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jan Minar | 1 |
| Hugo Armando | 0 |
Prosperita Open 2008 - Ostrava(05-05-2008)
| Minar | Stats | Armando |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 177 | Highest Rank | 148 |
| 44 | Age | 46 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 5 |
| 56% (328-254) | Career Total W/L | 51% (275-266) |
| $61,250 | Career Prize Money | $65,070 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-3 ret. | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 5 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jan Minar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Jan Minar
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Jaloviec
Player
Jan Minar
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Dominik Boehler
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
29 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(9) 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Daniel Lustig
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Jan Minar
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
16%
(
7 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Adam Majchrowicz
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
3
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
52 of
66)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Jan Minar
42%
(
27 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hugo Armando Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gianluca Naso
Player
Hugo Armando
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
15
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
56 of
78)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Armando
Player
Adam Feeney
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (328/254) | Win/Loss | 51% (275/266) |
| 56% (749/595) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (645/604) |
| 52% (6758/6122) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6171/5923) |
| 53% (46/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (45/52) |
| 57% (156/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (224/199) |
| 57% (124/94) | Indoor Hard W/L | 21% (3/11) |
| 40% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 342 | Aces Total | 111 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 212 | Total Double Faults | 95 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 560.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 499.22 |
| 66% (4347/6589) | 1st Serve % | 67% (2087/3134) |
| 68% (2941/4347) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1360/2053) |
| 51% (1149/2242) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (558/1050) |
| 42% (245/587) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (95/270) |
| 38% (2490/6582) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1093/2976) |
| 42% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 41% (14/20) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33% (5/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (14/24) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (75/61) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (183/162) | Challenger W/L | 51% (181/175) |
| 69% (123/56) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (324/571) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (272/524) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/5) |
| 50% (105/209) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (100/205) |
| 49% (92/187) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (78/172) |
| 84% (332/279) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (301/241) |
| 16% (332/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (301/57) |
| 20% (249/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (240/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
